<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Social Computing Lab : HP Labs : Latest Results</title>
<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/</link>
<description>Recent papers from HP Labs' Social Computing Lab</description>﻿<item>
  <title>Predicting the popularity of online content</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/predictions</link>
  <minidescription>popularity, youtube, digg, attention, predicting future downloads.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	<tag>attention</tag>
	<tag>youtube</tag>
	<tag>popularity</tag>
	<tag>social media</tag>
	<tag>predictions</tag>
	<tag>online content</tag>
  </tags>
  <description>
We present a method for accurately predicting the long time
popularity of online content from early measurements of
user access. Using two content sharing portals, Youtube
and Digg, we show that by modeling the accrual of views
and votes on content offered by these services we can
predict the long-term dynamics of individual submissions from
initial data. In the case of Digg, measuring access to given
stories during the first two hours allows us to forecast their
popularity 30 days ahead with remarkable accuracy, while
downloads of Youtube videos need to be followed for 10 days
to attain the same performance. The differing time scales
of the predictions are shown to be due to differences in how
content is consumed on the two portals: Digg stories quickly
become outdated, while Youtube videos are still found long
after they are initially submitted to the portal. We show
that predictions are more accurate for submissions for which
attention decays quickly, whereas predictions for evergreen
content will be prone to larger errors.


</description>
  <author>Gabor Szabo and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
  <date>2008-11-03 15:27:00</date>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Revealing the long tail in office conversations</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/watercooler</link>
  <minidescription>Visibility, attention, and recognition drive participation in internal corporate social media.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	<tag>watercooler</tag>
	<tag>blogs</tag>
	<tag>attention</tag>
	<tag>social media</tag>
	<tag>hp</tag>
	<tag>CSCW</tag>
  </tags>
  <description>
Blogs, wikis, and forums can break down geographic distances, workgroup boundaries, and organizational
hierarchy in an organization. While these tools significantly lower the barriers to producing content, employees may
perceive there to be little incentive to invest their own time in providing this content for public consumption. We found
that increasing visibility often motivated employees to participate and contribute content. Employees were
motivated by the opportunity for attention, and the ways in which social media tools enabled or hindered this
opportunity influenced the way it was used. In this paper, we describe the design and use of the internal social media
platforms at Hewlett-Packard and examine the ways that employees used these tools. Specifically, we explore ways
in which designing for increased visibility and providing opportunities for recognition improve the ways that social
media platforms can be used in organizations.

To appear at CSCW 2008 Workshop on Enterprise 3.0.
</description>
  <author>Michael J. Brzozowski and Sarita Yardi</author>
  <date>2008-10-13 15:27:00</date>
</item>

<item>
  <title>The pulse of the corporate blogosphere</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/blogging/</link>
  <minidescription>Participation in internal corporate blogs is both work-related and social, indicating a desire to connect with coworkers on multiple levels.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	<tag>blogs</tag>
	<tag>community</tag>
	<tag>temporal patterns</tag>
	<tag>hp</tag>
	<tag>CSCW</tag>
  </tags>
  <description>
Blogging at work has gained considerable interest in the knowledge management community. It is not clear, however, how much of work blogging is work-related versus social, 
or when work blogging takes place. In this poster, we present results from our examination of the temporal aspects of blogging within a large internal corporate blogging 
community. We compared our findings to similar analyses of employee email use and to college student Facebook use. We found that blog posting is temporally similar to email, 
while blog reading is more similar to Facebook messaging. Our results suggest that participation is both work-related and social, indicating a desire to connect to coworkers 
at multiple levels.

To appear at CSCW 2008.
  </description>
  <author>Sarita Yardi, Scott Golder, and Michael J. Brzozowski</author>
  <date>2008-10-13 15:15:00</date>
</item>


<item>
  <title>Social network collaborative filtering</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/sncf/</link>
  <minidescription>User-generated social networking links can be as predictive as algorithmically 
  identified "neighbors" in recommender systems.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>collaborative filtering</tag>
	  <tag>social networks</tag>
	  <tag>prediction</tag>
	<tag>recommender systems</tag>

  </tags> 
  <description>This paper demonstrates that "social network collaborative 
filtering" (SNCF), wherein user-selected like-minded alters are used to 
make predictions, can rival traditional user-to-user collaborative filtering (CF) 
in predictive accuracy. Using a unique data set from an online community 
where users rated items and also created social networking links specifically 
intended to represent like-minded “allies,” we use SNCF and traditional CF 
to predict ratings by networked users. We find that SNCF using generic "friend" 
alters is moderately worse than the better CF techniques, but outperforms 
benchmarks such as by-item or by-user average rating; generic friends often are not like-minded. 
However, SNCF using "ally" alters is competitive with CF. These results are significant 
because SNCF is tremendously more computationally efficient than traditional 
user-user CF and may be implemented in large-scale web commerce and social 
networking communities. It is notoriously difficult to distinguish the contributions 
of social influence (where allies influence users) and "social” selection 
(where users are simply effective at selecting like-minded people as their allies). 
Nonetheless, comparing similarity over time, we do show no evidence of strong 
social influence among allies or friends.
	</description>
	<author>Rong Zheng, Dennis M. Wilkinson and Foster Provost</author>
  <date>2008-10-06 12:00:00</date>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Crowdsourcing, Attention and Productivity</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/crowd/crowd.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>How to solve the digital commons dilemma.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>attention</tag>
	  <tag>social networks</tag>
	  <tag>reputation</tag>
	<tag>crowdsourcing</tag>

  </tags> 
  <description>The tragedy of the digital commons does not seem to prevent the
copious voluntary production of content that one witnesses in the web.
We show through an analysis of a massive data set from Youtube that
the productivity exhibited in crowdsourcing exhibits a strong positive
dependence on attention, measured by the number of downloads.
Conversely, a lack of attention leads to a decrease in the number of
videos uploaded and the consequent drop in productivity, which in
many cases asymptotes to no uploads whatsoever. Moreover, we observed
that uploaders compare themselves to others when having low
productivity and to themselves when exceeding a personal threshold.
	</description>
	<author>Bernardo A. Huberman, Daniel M. Romero and Fang Wu</author>
  <date>2008-09-11 12:00:00</date>
</item>

<item>
  <title>How public opinion forms</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/howopinions/wine.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>How web discourse evolves.

To appear in the Proceedings of the Workshop on Internet and Network Economics-2008
</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>opinion formation</tag>
	  <tag>social networks</tag>
	  <tag>polarization</tag>
	<tag>crowdsourcing</tag>

  </tags> 
  <description>No aspect of the massive participation in content creation
that the web enables is more evident than in the countless number of
opinions, news and product reviews that are constantly posted on the
Internet. Given their importance we have analyzed their temporal evo-
lution in a number of scenarios. We have found that while ignorance
of previous views leads to a uniform sampling of the range of opinions
among a community, exposure of previous opinions to potential review-
ers induces a trend following process which leads to the expression of
increasingly extreme views. Moreover, when the expression of an opinion
is costly and previous views are known, a selection bias softens the ex-
treme views, as people exhibit a tendency to speak out differently from
previous opinions. These findings are not only robust but also suggest
simple procedures to extract given types of opinions from the population
at large.
	</description>
	<author>Fang Wu and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
  <date>2008-09-11 12:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How Do People Respond to Reputation: Ostracize, Price Discriminate or Punish?</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/reputationExpt/reputation-expts-and-Prosper.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>How people use reputation information.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>reputation</tag>
	  <tag>incentive design</tag>
	  <tag>experimental economics</tag>
  </tags> 
  <description>We evaluated how people use reputation in a laboratory market and in
Prosper, an online microfinance business. We found people use
information on past behavior to ostracize previous poor performance
in both cases. The laboratory market did not show significant price
discrimination, but people used their ability to not fulfill
contracts to punish poor performers. Price discrimination was
significantly correlated with reputation in Prosper. Thus we find
people apply multiple strategies to deal with reputation.
	</description>
	<author>Kay-Yut Chen, Scott Golder, Tad Hogg and Cecilia Zenteno</author>
  <date>2008-08-19 12:00:00</date>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Experiments with Probabilistic Quantum Auctions</title>
  <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.4195</link>
  <minidescription>How people perform in an auction using simulated quantum information processing.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>quantum information</tag>
	  <tag>incentive design</tag>
	  <tag>experimental economics</tag>
  </tags> 
  <description>We describe human-subject laboratory experiments on probabilistic auctions based on previously proposed auction protocols involving the simulated manipulation and communication of quantum states. These auctions are probabilistic in determining which bidder wins, or having no winner, rather than always having the highest bidder win. Comparing two quantum protocols in the context of first-price sealed bid auctions, we find the one predicted to be superior by game theory also performs better experimentally. We also compare with a conventional first price auction, which gives higher performance. Thus to provide benefits, the quantum protocol requires more complex economic scenarios such as maintaining privacy of bids over a series of related auctions or involving allocative externalities.	</description>
	<author>Kay-Yut Chen and Tad Hogg</author>
  <date>2008-08-19 12:00:00</date>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Quantum Auctions</title>
  <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0800</link>
  <minidescription>A privacy-preserving auction using quantum information processing.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>quantum information</tag>
	  <tag>incentive design</tag>
	  <tag>game theory</tag>
  </tags> 
  <description>We present a quantum auction protocol using superpositions to represent bids and distributed search to identify the winner(s). Measuring the final quantum state gives the auction outcome while simultaneously destroying the superposition. Thus non-winning bids are never revealed. Participants can use entanglement to arrange for correlations among their bids, with the assurance that this entanglement is not observable by others. The protocol is useful for information hiding applications, such as partnership bidding with allocative externality or concerns about revealing bidding preferences. The protocol applies to a variety of auction types, e.g., first or second price, and to auctions involving either a single item or arbitrary bundles of items (i.e., combinatorial auctions). We analyze the game-theoretical behavior of the quantum protocol for the simple case of a sealed-bid quantum, and show how a suitably designed adiabatic search reduces the possibilities for bidders to game the auction. This design illustrates how incentive rather that computational constraints affect quantum algorithm choices.
	</description>
	<author>Tad Hogg, Pavithra Harsha and Kay-Yut Chen</author>
  <date>2008-08-19 12:00:00</date>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Admission Control in a Computational Market</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Thomas_Sandholm/sandholm2008a.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>Tradeoffs between using spot and reservation markets.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>tycoon</tag>
	  <tag>incentive design</tag>
	  <tag>resource allocation</tag>
	  <tag>markets</tag>
  </tags> 
  <description>We propose, implement and evaluate three admission models for
computational Grids. The models
take the expected demand into account and
offer a specific performance guarantee.
The main issue addressed is how users and providers should
make the tradeoff
between a best effort (low guarantee) spot market and
an admission controlled (high guarantee) reservation market.
Using a realistically modeled high performance
computing workload and utility models of user preferences,
we run experiments highlighting the conditions under which
different markets and admission models are efficient.
The experimental results show that providers can make
large efficiency gains if the admission model is chosen
dynamically based on the current load, likewise we show that
users have an opportunity to optimize their
job performance by carefully picking the right market
based on the state of the system, and the characteristics
of the application to be run. Finally, we provide simple
functional expressions that can guide both users and
providers when making decisions about guarantee
levels to request or offer.
	</description>
	<author>Thomas Sandholm, Kevin Lai, and Scott Clearwater</author>
  <date>2008-06-06 12:00:00</date>
</item>
</channel></rss>